 |
Tools and Hardware Reviews of Gilmour RM30 20-Inch Reel Mower with Grass CatcherCustomer Review: Excellent Reel Mower Summary: 5 Stars
You are thinking of a reel mower. Your answer is yes. And this is probably the one you want.
This review may hit your "TLDR" filter, but if you're seriously shopping it might be worth it.
Like the guy who reviewed the McCulloch MCM2013 20-Inch Push Reel Mower, I'm not interested in reel mowers for their hippie "green" nonsense. I just have a smallish subdivision yard, and high-maintenance technology is pointless for such a thing. And, with storage space at a premium, the concept of a mower I can hang on the wall is also nice. Last but not least, the claimed higher cut quality (better for the grass) was attractive.
I had recently inherited the lawn duties, and soon after the balky-engine 6.5hp rotary mower -- which required an order of magnitude more time and effort to crank and keep cranked than was rewarded in actual cutting -- finally totaled itself out. All the desperate pulls on the cord on level asphalt caused the old plastic wheels to break, with the left side wheels falling off during the last mow. At that point I dragged it through the yard on two wheels out of sheer spite until it sputtered and refused to start again.
I decided I was going electric or push reel, if the price was right. (No scythe, sorry.) Electric was intriguing, but cordless comes at a high price. We had a fairly new gas trimmer, so cord management would be an extra and unique chore. (If I had one of those inexpensive corded trimmers, I'd have gone all-electric and had the trimmer strapped on the back ready for quick-switching like some electric grass ninja. Now, if the trimmer dies I'll probably get one of those grass-shears-on-a-stick by Fiskars.
Note well that I have virtually no twig/stick or leaf producing item in my yard, and no gravel. Things like that might've given me pause.
So I did my usual exhaustive research. You may know the Scott's 20-inch mower is reported to have nylon plastic gearing instead of metal, and that it is made in China by a company called American (which also makes the Great States mowers). You may not know the aforementioned McCulloch is visibly identical to the Lowe's "Task Force" and the pricier ProMow reel mower. Also, the cheap no-name green mowers on eBay are a special model developed and sold by QVC, and have bad reviews. The Gilmour is visibly identical to the "Mark's Choice" red reel mower. And I could tell you other various things, but suffice it to say that I knew as much about reel mowers as I could without ever having actually owned one myself.
My criteria, in approximate order:
1. Value
a. Cost
b. Blade Count and Cut Performance on Centipede+Weeds+Random Green Things
c. Mechanical Quality and Durability
2. Maximum Cutting Width
3. Maintenance (e.g. Sharpening)
4. American-made
5. Grass Catcher (not required, but would be nice)
I had no intention of overpaying for a German Brill or Swedish Husqvarna or Chinese-made Sunlawn mower. I just couldn't see the point. I also focused exclusively on 20 inchers, save for the "American" 16-inch 7-blade designed for bent grass, which I have on this lumpy partly-Centipede southeastern US weedgarden/lawn.
So my choices were thus down to Scott's, Gilmour, the McCulloch/Task Force/ProMow, and the 7-blade.
At the time of my purchase, all three of the 20-inchers were competitive price-wise, with perhaps $20 separating the highest from the lowest. The 7-blade was a few dollars cheaper. The ProMow brand is just an expensive paintjob, compared to the identical McCulloch. The Task Force is better ... it includes a grass catcher. Scott's plastic geared, non-sharpening, catcher-lessness put it out of the running.
I had a little trouble choosing between the Gilmour and McCulloch. The Gilmour had a lot more exposure on Amazon and elsewhere than the McCulloch, with over ten times as many reviews. The Gilmour was also self-sharpening, and came with a grass catcher. Country of origin was irrelevant, as none are US-made . . . but I almost chose McCulloch because at least they are made in Taiwan, and not China. But in the end, it wasn't enough. The Gilmour also knocked off the 7-blader, since I don't think this lawn requires 7 due to its lower density than, say, a golf green.
The Task Force might have been an acceptable alternative, but it isn't designed to be self-sharpening. And, it has a smaller cutting range (1.75-2.75 vs. 1-3). Last but not least, it has poor reviews on the Lowe's website.
So I went with the Gilmour. Here are a few notes on what I've seen with it so far:
1. The front tires are an older, smelly rubber compound, but they're very good. The wheels supporting the tires appear to be plastic, which is a minor disappointment. However, the Task Force appears to have plastic wheels, too, and reviews suggest these are better.
2. It is easy to push in low Centipede, thanks to the bearings. I can keep the reels spinning in a turn (with just one wheel turning) and push the thing one-handed on smooth ground. Note that it won't be as easy to push as a *self-propelled* rotary mower (duh!), but it is as easy if not easier than a gas-powered push mower. That engine and steel deck weigh a good bit, but it evens out some since the reel mower takes some extra energy to turn the reel. It is, however, far easier to maneuver, and can be picked up if needed.
3. I put the handle together in 10-15 minutes (if that), and hand-tightened the bolts and screws. I mowed a few test patches, then retightened with actual tools (use a 10mm socket). I then mowed the front yard and part of the back yard, and there was one slightly loose screw but the rest were good. I haven't had a problem in the week since. Even if I had, though, it is easier than sharpening blades, and way easier than cleaning the carburetor!
4. It is not silent. I can hear my cellphone ringing in the pocket (try THAT with a gas rotary!), but I wouldn't try to talk and mow at the same time. I would say the volume is equivalent to a slow skateboarding kid on concrete, but a higher pitch. If you want lower volume, get a non-contact, non-self-sharpening reel mower. I didn't care.
5. This mower does well on grass, chops Japanese clover, and slices up all the other random stuff this yard threw at it. It even punches through well-fortified antbeds. As with a walk-behind, you have to hop over. I have yet to mow on very tall grass (trying to avoid it).
7. I encountered a random piece of cedar mulch in the yard that had somehow emigrated from elsewhere. Yes, I came to a dead stop. Since the gearing does not engage in reverse, you do have to turn the reel with finger or toe so the item falls out.
8. Yes, on bent grasses you may have stray blades or weeds that get missed. However, both powered rotary push mowers and powered rotary riding mowers have missed blades in this yard. This will never be a golf green, so a stray grass blade doesn't concern me much. Overlap a little, just like on a gas push.
9. The yard looks better. The grass was yellowed from a riding mower cut (despite just-sharpened blades), and the grass itself was damaged and purple where the tire tracks ran over it. Since I've reel-mowed, the yellow tips are gone and the purple is fading.
10. The grass catcher is good enough. Breezy conditions allow escapes (the Task Force's catcher may be superior with its higher side walls), but it catches the vast majority. I can mow in crocs without getting blades trapped inside with the grass catcher, otherwise not.
So there you have it.
Customer Review: Excellent mower Summary: 5 Stars
This mower is very good. I used to have a gas mower for 5 years, till it broke down and just would not start, even though I changed the spark plug air filter. The local repair shop said they would charge min. $100 for fixing it. I decided to go for a push reel mower instead, since my yard is not that big about 0.19 acre and also I would not have all of the problems associated with gas mower.
I have used it once so far, and it beats a gas mower in most of the ways. It takes the same amount of time to mow. The mow quality is better, there is no need to bag the grass, since it mulches it into very fine pieces. No smell of gas, no smoke, no noise and environmentally friendly. The blades are self sharpening, so there is no need to take it to a local shop after few years of use for blade sharpening. It is easier to push and maneuver this mower since it light.
Only thing I would point out is if there is small stick/branch in the way, it will get stuck. Sometime if the weed or grass is very tall then you have to run it over a few times to mow then.
Assembly is easy, all you need to do is attach the handle.
Overall, I think this mower is a very good value for money.
Customer Review: Fit of Handles and Illustration in Illustructions are Poor BUT Operation of Mower is Adequate for the Intended Task Summary: 4 Stars
Gilmour 20-Inch Reel Mower With Grass Catcher #RM30
First, I will pass along my thoughts on assembly and the parts as provided. This portion of the review is only for the assembly aspect and the apparent quality of the parts. The fit of the handle parts is poor and the instructions for attaching the handle to the mower frame are not sufficently clear.
The following tools are needed: (1) a medium-headed phillips screwdriver; (2) 10mm Wrench; (3) 13mm Wrench. The medium-headed phillips screwdriver is used in conjunction with the 10mm Wrench to tighten 6 "bolts" (provided in the box) in the assembly of the handle. The 13mm Wrench is used to loosen and tighten the carriage headed bolts on the mower assembly on which the handle fits. In this application, a socket set would probably work better than a wrench set. However, I used wrenches.
The 10mm Wrench is also used to adjust a coil spring loaded bolt that adjusts the distance between the movable blades on the reel and the fixed blade. Most probably, the box should not be opened until these tools are available.
The instructions are not well illustrated. The precise location where the handles fit onto the mower frame is not indicated. Three sets of bolts are possible locations, but attaching the handle to the lower of the three will not work as the handle does not fit properly to that set of bolts (ask me why I know). Be advised that the carriage headed bolt located already installed on the mower frame is apparently the desired bolt for attaching the handle to the mower.
The handle is a four piece assembly: (1) the one piece upper section with a rubber piece that the person grips; (2) a left and right middle section that slip fits together with and then is bolted onto the upper section; and (3) the lower section that bolts onto the mower frame and is also bolted onto the two left and right pieces previously described. The handle pieces do not fit well together. Lots of slop exists where the upper and middle handle tubes slip fit together. The assembled handle feels wobbly even after bolting is completed. The handle portion (lower section) that fits onto the frame does not match well with the middle section.
If the tools are available, if the parts fit together as well as they should, and if the instructions were as clear as they should be, assembly should have only taken a few minutes.
The second portion of the review addresses the actual performance of the push reel mower, which performed adequately during the cutting of our duplex lawn. As some reviewers have indicated, mowers of this type do not cut down the tall spindly weeds very well. Generally, this statement did apply to the performance of the Gilmour Push Reel Mower. However, my 16 year old son found that he could entice the mower to cut even these weeds most of the time if he quickly pushed the mower in such a way to cause the blades to spin rapidly and then mowed the weeds.
Starting with the blade height near the highest position, the mower was easy to push. Push effort on our lawn was not significantly increased even though we reduced the blade height to the second shortest level. We did note that the lawn looked better with a shorter cut.
Regarding the handle assembly and instruction issues, the mower is rated poorly. The mower deserves a rating much better in the actual performance of its task. The indicated overall rating of the mower is weighted heavily toward the performance aspect. My 16 year old son wanted a power mower but actually seemed to get a kick out of using this push mower. He became sufficiently interested to experiment with the effect of blade height on lawn appearance.
Given our limited experience, I would buy it again. I intend to post additional information as experience gained with the use of the mower is obtained.
Customer Review: Forget the Grasscatcher Summary: 3 Stars
In my small yard I need to make tight turns and there isn't room to get up much speed. The result was a fairly rough cut and grass swept out of the basket with every turn. Even with the setting adjustments, it seems I am stuck with a product that isn't very impressive. The yard dimensions should probably be addressed in the sales pitch, as having to do circular shotput motions around tall blades that prefer to lie down rather than sever with the rest can be pretty annoying. If I weren't a green buff, I'd probably opt out for a noisy smelly motor. Instead, I will consider the breathy cussing over this season's lawm mowing to be a form of mantra and offer it up for the environment.
Customer Review: Forget the bag. Summary: 2 Stars
This lawn mower is adequate if your grass is bone dry, which it never is in the northwest. And forget the bag, The grass flies all over the place, except in the bag. If I had it to do over, I'd go electric.
More Customer Reviews: First Review 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Last Review
|
 |